|
Montebello
E-News
January
17, 2008
The horror of the Twentieth Century was the size of each new event,
and the paucity of its reverberation.
Norman
Mailer, 1923 – 2007,
an
American novelist, journalist, playwright, screenwriter, and film director.
Along with Truman Capote, Joan Didion, and Tom Wolfe, Mailer is considered
an innovator of creative nonfiction, a genre sometimes called “New
Journalism,” but which covers the essay to the nonfiction novel.
[Is
Mailer saying that we failed to learn from our mistakes or those of others?
Genocides continued, wars continued, captains of industry continued
becoming pirates of infamy. And
in this century?]
1.
Plausible Denial and Plausible Transparency
2.
A Not-So-Divine Comedy, Part 4
3.
Announcements
4.
Fun Facts about Louisiana
5.
The Flashback Quarterback:
Just the Facts, M'am
6.
Beware and Share: Dirt
under the Rug?
7. About
Montebello E-News and “My
Montebello”
Plausible Denial and Plausible Transparency
We have heard of “plausible denial,” a phrase which
describes a lie which comes across enough like the truth to quiet the
critics or satisfy the investigators. What
is “plausible transparency”?
Plausible transparency refers to somebody coming across
as if he or she were open and honest, but, in fact, was hiding something.
Republicans would point to former President Clinton’s manipulation
of English with a straight face in order to deny his misadventure with
Monica Lewinski. Democrats would
point to President Bush’s congenial style, as when he leans on the lectern
and speaks informally during a press conference, thereby projecting candor
as he pitches the official lie.
If we consider plausible transparency a problem—as we
should, because people die and scarce funds are misspent—what can we do
about it?
You have heard of too many cooks in the kitchen
spoiling the broth? Try this new
one: many ears to the wall spoil
the lie. The only way to ensure
that those in power, be they in government or corporate
America
, stay honest is to stand by them and around them when they do their work.
Said another way, be the guardian angels, help them to avoid
temptation.
We need more people in government decision-making and
in corporate decision-making, so that nobody dare to use plausible denial or
plausible transparency.
If you answer the
multiple-choice questions below and e-mail to lessonanswers@mymontebello.com
with “Lesson answers” in the subject field, you will be credited toward
a “certificate of recognition in community affairs” to be awarded in
2007 by a local nonprofit organization.
1. What is plausible transparency?
(a) The ability to come across as candid when telling a
lie.
(b) A new type of glass which filters out sunlight but
lets in the warmth of the sun.
2. What do we do about plausible transparency?
(a) Let it go, as it is a common human trait.
(b) Involve more people in decision-making, so that
plausible transparency would not work.
A
Not-So-Divine Comedy, Part 4
No one can earn
a million dollars honestly.
William Jennings
Bryan, 1860 – 1925,
an American lawyer,
statesman, and politician, three times the
Democratic Party
nominee for President of the United States.
The decadent international but
individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found ourselves after
the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not beautiful. It is
not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn't deliver the goods.
-----
Capitalism is the astounding belief
that the most wickedest [sic] of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of
everyone.
John Maynard Keynes, 1883 – 1946,
a British economist whose ideas, called Keynesian economics, had a
major impact on modern economic and political theory, as well as on
many governments’ fiscal policies.
In part one, we looked at the features of modern-day
capitalism as practiced here in the
United States
. In part two, we read of the
role played by natural disasters in boosting a local economy.
In part three, we saw the tie between commercializing holidays and
keeping the economy strong.
Is it fair to say that capitalism is not the solution
to every problem, every opportunity?
We have seen examples in E-News about the
private sector’s involvement in health care.
When those whose primary motive is to make profit make decisions
about treatments for the ill, is there not an undeniable conflict?
Let us go beyond health care.
Should private companies run the insurance industry, as there would
be a natural tendency for them to try to find reasons to deny claims, so as
to maximize profit?
Should the private sector take over the public schools?
How would companies make a profit if they had to educate children
with special needs? Also, would
they not want to control the curriculum, so as to ensure high achievement by
children?
There are services which companies would provide for
which they would choose the less risky, less demanding consumers to whom to
provide services, so as to make the most profit.
Those consumers who would be more risky or more demanding would be
excluded, meaning that those consumers would go without or government and /
or nonprofit organizations would have to step in.
The primary consideration for companies, if not their
only consideration, is to make profit, whether to satisfy the executive team
or the shareholders, this consideration tempered a bit by the possible
fallout from adverse publicity. As
for adverse publicity, companies will keep as tight a lid as possible on
their decisions affecting consumers or they will hire experts in public
relations to put out fires caused by adverse publicity.
Does it not seem odd that an executive team or
shareholders living far from a community of consumers would make decisions
on that community, without the community having equivalent
input in the decisions?
It might be that there would be many
services, even products, which should not be brought to consumers
through capitalism. Capitalism
cannot be the solution to every problem, every opportunity.
Announcements
FOR EVERYONE.
$80 in one minute from the Federal government.
It took me
one minute to order two $40 coupons from the Federal government, to be
applied toward a converter box, so that the family be able to watch
television starting in 2009. Not
a hoax; this is real.
From a Web site: …But for those who happen to depend on that old TV and "free"
analog television--not cable or satellite--and want to continue watching TV
beyond February 18, 2009, the coupon should be a big deal. Under the new
program, every household in the country will be able to apply for as many as
two coupons, each worth $40 toward the price of a converter box. The boxes
are expected to sell for between $50 and $70. ...
To
receive one or two coupons, go to www.dtv2009.gov.
FOR EVERYONE.
Chatting is good for the brain.
Talking with friends could help keep the mind sharp,
suggests a study of more than 3,000 adults.
Researchers
at the University
of
Michigan
believe that socialising [this
is how the British spell the word]
"exercises" the mind in the same way as reading and doing
crosswords - which have already been recommended for the elderly. ... For
the full report, from BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2352651.stm
.
FOR EVERYONE.
City-council meeting.
The next regular meeting of the Montebello
city council will be at city hall on Wednesday, January 23, 2008, at 7:30
p.m. If you wish to speak during
orals, come before 7:30 p.m. and sign up.
If you have more to say than there is time allotted, prepare a one
pager, make copies, and hand out before you speak.
FOR EVERYONE.
Fascinating photos.
Some
of the best photographs available for free on the Internet come from NASA.
Here are photos from the space shuttle and space station:
http://www.texasjim.com/NASApix/NASA%20pix.htm
.
Fun
Facts about Louisiana
The Battle of New Orleans, which made Andrew Jackson a
national hero, was fought two weeks after the War of 1812 had ended and more
than a month before the news of the war’s end had reached Louisiana.
Louisiana
was named in honor of King Louis XIV of
France.
Louisiana
is the only state with a large population of Cajuns, descendants of the
Acadians who were driven out of Canada
in the 1700s because they would not pledge allegiance to the King of
England. [Seriously, at least
they were not massacred.]
The Superdome in New Orleans
is the world’s largest steel-constructed room unobstructed by posts.
Height is 273 feet, diameter of dome 680 feet [about twice the length of a
football field], area of roof 9.7 acres [wow!], interior space 125,000,000
cubic feet, total floor footage 269,000 square feet [our house is about
2,200 square feet], electrical wiring 400 miles.
The first American army to have African American
officers was the confederate Louisiana Native Guards. The
Corps d’Afrique at Port Hudson was sworn into service on September 27,
1862. [Now, that is a twist!]
In
Louisiana, biting someone with your natural teeth is considered a simple assault, but
biting someone with your false teeth is considered an aggravated assault.
[It would be interesting to know the history behind this difference.]
In 1803 the
United States
paid
France
$15 million for the
Louisiana
Territory. 828,000 square miles of land
west of the
Mississippi River. [Did the
U.S.
get a deal?
Montebello
has 8.4 square miles. At the
same rate and according to the value of the dollar at that time,
Montebello
would have been bought for less than $153.]
The lands acquired stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky
Mountains and from the
Gulf of Mexico
to the Canadian border. Thirteen
states were carved from the Louisiana
Territory. The Louisiana Purchase nearly
doubled the size of the United States.
French speaking Acadians in the mid-1700s settled the
Lafayette Parish region of south Louisiana. The Acadians were joined by
another group of settlers, called “Creoles,” descendants of African,
West Indian, and European pioneers. At
the time of the migration,
Louisiana
was under Spanish rule and authorities welcomed the new settlers.
The city of
Kaplan
is referred to as the most Cajun place on Earth.
The town of Jean Lafitte
was once a hideaway for pirates.
http://www.fun-facts.com/item/86106
The
Flashback Quarterback: Just the Facts,
M'am
In
last week’s E-News, there was an article by a professor of
economics which said that the United States
did not have to worry about Mexican immigration, that the problem would
solve itself.
Whether
that be true or not, that does raise the question as to whether we in the
States would be spending money effectively in addressing immigration, more
so because money is becoming scarcer for other government services.
A
different professor notified me of two articles on the contribution of
immigrants to the U.S.
economy. The summary from one
article:
As the debate
over illegal immigration continues to rage, some pundits and policymakers
are claiming that unauthorized immigrants do not pay taxes and rely heavily
on government benefits. Neither of these claims is borne out by the facts.
Undocumented men have work force participation rates that are higher than
other workers, and all undocumented immigrants are ineligible for most
government services, but pay taxes as workers, consumers, and residents.
The first paragraph from the other article:
Most studies claiming to calculate the net “costs” of immigration to
the U.S. economy suffer from one or more fatal flaws: • They rely upon
single-year “snapshots” of the immigrant population that fail to account
for the fact that the income levels and tax contributions of immigrants
increase over time and from generation to generation; • They count the
education and care of the U.S.-born children of immigrants as “costs”
incurred by immigrant households, but classify these same children as
“natives” when they are working, tax-paying adults; • They do not
consider economic contributions such as consumer purchasing power and the
formation of businesses, both of which create jobs and provide federal,
state, and local governments with additional revenue through sales, income,
business, and property taxes.
Judgment
should be reserved until one sees counterarguments, but, again, the question
is raised whether we would be doing the right thing presently in addressing
immigration.
Let
me know if you would like me to e-mail you the two studies, which are in .pdf.
Beware and Share: Dirt
under the Rug?
Well,
we received the ballot-proposition guide from the California Secretary of
State, for the February election here in California. For those of us who have freed
themselves from television and do not know of the hot issue, here it is:
the expansion of Indian gaming on four reservations.
Hearing
the pro and con arguments can leave us frustrated.
Who is right? That is why
gathering with friends at Starbucks to analyze can be fun and fruitful.
There is something else which we can do which goes beyond weighing
the pro and con arguments; we
can ask questions which few people ask:
(a)
how many people are on the state gaming commission and whom do they
represent? Does the majority of
commissioners represent the public?
(b)
how transparent are the commission’s and the tribes’ activities, that
is, how quickly can we learn who is earning how much and where the money is
going?
(c)
who chooses the accountant to examine the books of the casinos?
(d)
if Indian gaming is good for tribes, why are there tribes which are opposed?
About
Montebello E-News and “My Montebello”
To learn about this newsletter, Montebello E-News,
and the accompanying, growing Web site, “My Montebello”, visit
www.mymontebello.com. Also, you
will find instructions and contact information for submitting announcements
for publication in this newsletter.
|