|
Montebello
E-News
June
21, 2007
The only ones
among you who will be really happy are
those who will
have sought and found how to serve.
Albert
Schweitzer, M.D., 1875 – 1965,
Alsatian
theologian, musician, philosopher, and physician
1. Fight the Devil, Become the Devil
2.
From History to Hysteria, Part 3
3.
Announcements
4.
A Couple of Fun Facts
5.
The Flashback Quarterback on Meaning Well, Creating Hell
6.
About Montebello
E-News and “My Montebello”
Fight the Devil, Become the Devil
I like where I work, because there are
opportunities for interesting conversation. I had one last Saturday morning
with somebody who used to be on the city council. (Note my unusual
quotation marks below, meant to indicate that I do not remember the
conversation verbatim, a point made in the essay “From History to
Hysteria”.)
‘What if we [the voters of
Montebello] chose to expand our city council to nine seats, each with a
district?’ I asked.
‘It would not help,” she said.
‘If we became a charter city?’
‘No. The answer is to vote out
those city councilors who do not act in the interest of the people.’
Hmmm. I pause to think. Now, hours later, an answer comes.
When we fight the devil, we risk becoming the devil. We elect
candidates who promise reform in Congress, but the reform does not happen.
(Look back to 1994, at the Republican Party’s “Contract with America”.
It is no different for our state legislature, county board of supervisors or
city council. The devil, that is, the political culture and
institutions, is strong. A candidate goes on a crusade and find
himself / herself joining the devil, perhaps unknowingly.)
It is either naïve for a
candidate to think, or disingenuous for him or her to say, that he or
she could change a political culture and its institutions, even when he is
she is part of a large group. (In 1994, Republicans gained fifty-four seats
and took control of the U.S. House of Representatives for the first time
since 1954.
They remained the majority until early 2007.
What significant, permanent positive change took place during those twelve
years?)
How, then, to beat the devil?
Change the rules of the game. Double, triple, even quadruple the number of
elective seats, enabling a large number of people to bring the change which
a relatively small number could not bring under the present arrangement.
If you answer the multiple-choice questions
below and e-mail to
lessonanswers@mymontebello.com with “Lesson answers” in the subject
field, you will be credited toward a “certificate of recognition in
community affairs” to be awarded in 2007 by a local nonprofit organization.
1. “Fight the Devil, Become the Devil”
means that
(a) dirty tricks would have to be used to
change the political culture.
(b) an elected official with good intentions
would not be able to do away the vices he or she is trying to change and, in
fact, might succumb to those vices.
2. Beating the devil would necessitate
(a) overwhelming and changing the political
culture by greatly increasing the number of elective seats and then electing
people committed to changing that culture.
(b) changing the state constitution so that
every elected body in California be significantly increased in size,
enabling a large number of citizens to dislodge and replace the entrenched
the political culture.
From History to Hysteria,
Part 3
(1) Skepticism, like chastity, should not be
relinquished too readily.
(2) Those who cannot remember the past are
condemned to repeat it.
George Santayana
Spanish-born philosopher, essayist, poet,
and novelist, 1863 – 1952
In part one of this essay we noted the
harmony between Santayana’s two statements. In part two, we noted the
contradiction between the two statements, leading to the conclusion that the
history we learned was more an espousal of a faith, rather than a
recounting of facts. Where would that conclusion leave history, given that
history is taught in compulsory and higher education? Said another way,
might we be wasting much time by teaching and learning history?
If our purpose were to espouse a
faith, the secular faith of the United States, then history
should continue as it is now taught, but with the universal revelation and
universal realization that we would be teaching and learning a faith.
What we should require, though, is that the faith be taught thoroughly,
so that the faith serve as a better guide for our decisions. (An example of
thoroughness is the inclusion, in our history lessons, of the quotation from
General McClellan in part one of this essay, June 7, 2007.)
If, on the other hand, our purpose
were to espouse the secular faith of humankind, then history
should continue, but with changes to reflect interpretations of facts not
espoused by the faith of the United States. You see where this is going? A
secular faith of humankind might enable us Americans to better understand
the views, virtues, and vices of other peoples, but we would be weakening
American patriotism, perhaps paralyzing and pulverizing our patriotism.
But does the above not beg a
question: what business does a faith, even a secular faith, masquerading as
history have in a classroom meant to teach past reality? Should we not set
aside teaching history completely?
If we did take history out of the curriculum, with what would we replace it?
Do I see a few eager waving hands? I would choose critical thinking,
rhetoric, polemics, and the Socratic method of teaching.
This sounds odd, one would say,
because we must understand historical references to communicate with one
another and understand literature. Yes, we must understand historical
references to communicate and understand, but, no, the references would come
only after we had a thorough and continual grounding, much more than
is now done, in critical thinking, rhetoric, polemics, and the Socratic
method of teaching. The important point is that, going back to the first
quotation of Santayana, we would lay the basis for prudent decision-making
through skepticism and would practice skepticism, judging historical and
contemporary references in light of that skepticism.
How would the world be different
if that happened? We explore that in the next part.
Announcements
FOR EVERYONE. Free
summer concerts. Thursdays from
6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. in the
Montebello City Park band shell. The
following bands will perform:
July 5: Hard
Days Night
July 12: Cold
Duck
July 19: Yare
More
July 26: Chico
August 2: (To Be
Announced)
August 9: (To Be
Announced)
August 16: Montebello
Wise Guys
August 23: Mariachis
Divas
August 30: Ace
For more information,
contact the Montebello City Department of Parks and Recreation at
323.887.4540.
FOR FAMILIES.
Housing Fair. Have you
remembered the free event at the Montebello Senior Center this Saturday?
For more information, contact 323.722.3955.
FOR EVERYONE.
Meeting. The next regular
meeting of the Montebello city council will be at city hall on Wednesday,
June 27, 2007, at 7:30 p.m. If you wish to speak during orals, come before
7:30 p.m. and sign up. If you have more to say than there is time allotted,
prepare a one pager, make copies, and hand out before you speak.
FOR YOUTH AND THEIR
TEACHERS. Money for youth. From
RFP Bulletin,, Foundation Center, 6.15.07. The organization Do
Something is offering weekly grants for young social entrepreneurs (do you
know what that means?). Deadline: rolling Do Something,
http://www.dosomething.org/, is a not-for-profit organization that works to inspire, support, and
celebrate young social entrepreneurs and community activists. The
organization is accepting applications for the following grant programs:
Do Something and GameStop, http://www.gamestop.com/, are offering grants of $500 each to
young people, age 25 and younger, in the U.S. or Canada who have a great
idea for a community-action project and need support to turn their idea into
reality. GameStop grants are given out weekly.
Do Something and Plum
TV, http://www.plumtv.com/, are offering grants of $500 each to social
entrepreneurs, age 25 and younger, in the U.S. who have recently created a
sustainable project, program, or organization and need funding to further
the growth and success of their
program. Plum TV grants are given out weekly.
Visit the Do Something
Web site for complete program information and application forms.
FOR YOUTH AND THEIR
TEACHERS. Money for youth. Youth
Service America Venture Program offers micro-grants for young people to
start social ventures. Deadline: August 13, 2007. The Youth
Service America-Youth Venture Program, a joint partnership between Youth
Service America, http://www.ysa.org/, and Youth Venture, Inc.,
http://www.genv.net/, is now accepting applications from young people across the United
States who are interested in starting their own sustainable social ventures.
Examples of possible
ventures include a youth center designed to keep youth out of trouble with
music and art programs; an anti-peer pressure education campaign; a bike
repair shop with a vocational training program; or an assembly program
touring inner-city schools that combines music with an anti-drug/violence
performances.
Ventures must be
youth-led and designed to be a lasting, sustainable asset to the community. YSA Youth Venture teams are required to plan a Global Youth Service Day,
http://YSA.org/NYSD/,
project every year that their venture is operational. The YSA Youth Venture
Program provides a variety of resources, including a national network of
like-minded young people, media opportunities, technical support, helpful
toolkits and workshops, as well as grants of up to $1,000 each for start-up
expenses.
Visit the Youth Venture
Web site for complete program information.
A Couple of Fun Facts
The first animal to go
into space was a dog named Laika, sent up by the Soviets. The first living
creatures which the United States sent into space were two mice, named Benjy
and Laska, in 1958.
The Flashback Quarterback on
Meaning Well, Creating Hell
In this newsletter, we
have noted that there is a difference between a solution and a
sustainable solution. The difference arises sometimes because we have
not thought about how to make our solution sustainable. Below is an
example. What would you have done to make the solution sustainable?
An answer is given below the article.
From The Sunday Times (UK), April 15,
2007
“How Rainforest Saviour Put 1,000 Out of
Work”, Tom Hennigan
The Tory party donor and environmental
philanthropist Johan Eliasch has been accused of “green colonialism” after
allegedly consigning 1,000 people to poverty in his attempts to preserve the
Amazon jungle.
The allegations against Eliasch, who last
week was touring South America with his friend the Duke of York, come from
the inhabitants of a region of the Brazilian rainforest the size of Greater
London.
In 2005 the Swedish-born tycoon, who runs
the Head sports goods empire, spent a reported £13.7m of his estimated £361m
fortune buying 400,000 acres — about 625 square miles — of jungle from an
American-owned timber company with the aim of protecting it from loggers.
Eliasch has described the move as “my little bit towards saving the world”.
As a result of the deal, a lumber mill that
employed as many as 1,000 people closed in the town of Itacoatiara in
northwest Brazil, increasing hardship in an already economically depressed
region. …
What might Eliasch have
done differently? First, he should have conferred with the people who were
going to lose their jobs. Second, he should have set aside money to create
jobs for those people or to help them start their own businesses. What kind
of jobs and businesses? Park rangers and tour guides, with the condition
that, if the park were damaged, the rangers and guides would lose pay
equivalent to what it would take to restore the park.
About
Montebello
E-News and “My Montebello”
To learn about this
newsletter, Montebello E-News, and the accompanying, growing Web
site, “My Montebello”, visit www.mymontebello.com. Also, you will find
instructions and contact information for submitting announcements for
publication in this newsletter.
|