| |
Montebello
E-News
June
26, 2008
It is indeed an
odd business that it has taken this Court nearly two centuries to discover a
constitutional mandate to have counsel at a preliminary hearing.
Warren
Earl Burger, 1907 – 1995,
was
Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1969 to 1986. Although
Burger was a conservative and considered a strict constructionist, still
under his leadership, the United States Supreme Court delivered a variety of
major decisions on abortion, capital punishment, religious establishment,
and school desegregation.
[We
talk about “inalienable rights”. Should
all of these rights have been obvious in 1776 or are some
of these inalienable rights a product of the times, in which case can they be
considered inalienable?]
1.
Volunteering: Good for Community
or Good for Capitalism?
2.
Social-Impact Report, Part 1
3.
Announcements
4.
Fun Facts about South Dakota
5.
The Flashback Quarterback: See
No Evil, Hear No Evil
6.
Be Aware and Share: Too Good to
Be True
7.
About
Montebello
E-News and “My
Montebello”
Volunteering:
Good for Community or Good for Capitalism?
This
month [May] take the time to consider how you could involve some of the
older citizens in your community in your service-learning projects.
"Every week thousands of older Americans give back to their communities
by volunteering through groups like Senior Corps. From teaching young
children how to read, to helping provide relief to those affected by natural
disasters, seniors play an important and compassionate role in our
Nation." This from a
Proclamation by President Bush declaring May, 2008, “Older American's
Month”. Read the entire proclamation here:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/04/20080423-2.html
. ... From K-12 SL listserv, May 3, 2008.
An
announcement like this is heartwarming.
But there is a nagging thought: do
we promote voluntarism because it is good for the community or good for
capitalism?
Yes,
our immediate answer is the former, but that does not soothe the soul.
The nagging thought continues.
Is
our government promoting voluntarism because it is good for capitalism, that
is, volunteers will do with their time what capitalists will not do with
their money? From a business’
standpoint, is it not a better business deal for a business to give away
$1,000,000 in awards to volunteers instead of paying $100,000,000 in taxes?
If
you answer the multiple-choice questions below and e-mail to lessonanswers@mymontebello.com
with “Lesson answers” in the subject field, you will be credited toward
a “certificate of recognition in community affairs” to be awarded in
2008 by a local nonprofit organization.
1.
How can older Americans help in
their communities?
(a)
Teaching children to read.
(b)
Assisting with disaster relief.
2.
What is the nagging thought?
(a)
That voluntarism is not enough to address the ills of Montebello.
(b)
That voluntarism is supported by businesses as a substitute for their paying
taxes.
Social-Impact Report,
Part 1
When most
companies close the year, they assess their financial performance and thank
their customers for sales. While we definitely succeeded on that dimension
this year with over 1,000 retail locations across the United States and 300%
sales growth, our far more important impact was increasing the quality of
life for thousands of women and children across the globe – and we want to
thank you for making that possible. ...
Priya
Haji, Co-founder and CEO
“World
of Good” Social-Impact Report 2006, http://www.worldofgood.com/impact/index.shtml
A
“social-impact report”? We
have heard of “environmental-impact report”;
for example, one has to be filed with regard to the disposition of
our Montebello Hills before a decision be made about the hills.
What
would a social-impact report, a “SIR”, contain?
The
quote above gives a glimpse of what a SIR would contain.
At the same time, a SIR could not be as definitive as an
environment-impact report, because the latter is often based on empirical
science, while a SIR would be based less on empiricism.
For example, how would one predict happiness if a particular change
were to occur, like leaving the Montebello Hills undeveloped or, to the
contrary, developing the hills?
Well-documented
history could help give credence to SIR, provided that we remembered the E-News
essay which compared history to a secular faith, that is, history would
always be suspect to some extent, in part because we could not gather all
the accurate and all the relevant data upon which to draw conclusions.
For example, if we looked at the immigration of Europeans to the New
World in the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries, we could
predict and have some confidence that people with similar backgrounds and a
similar purpose, supported by superior weaponry, settling upon relatively
open lands, with large potential for development, would produce similar
results sociologically, namely, the United States as it was and now is.
Having
an SIR would be strongly opposed by businesses and, perhaps, by government,
because the consequences of business and government decisions would have to
be analyzed and a report issued, this report delaying, perhaps canceling, a
project on the drawing board. As
is it, an environment-impact report would be a burden.
A SIR would more than double that burden because social impact would
not be as quantifiable.
Would
an SIR be more trouble than it was worth?
In coming parts to this essay, let us imagine what a SIR would say
about certain activities, planned or in progress, in our society.
Announcements
FOR EVERYONE.
Happy birthday.
On
June 28, 2008,
the community is invited to a Fandango |