My Montebello      
 Montebello Newsletter      Montebello,CA
   HOME  | "E-News" | Life's Problems  | "Montebello Oil" | Open Suggestion | Public Documents | Setting an Example | Young Thinkers | Project Instructions
                        Issues           and Solutions             Activities                    Box          

                                            
Back to Table of Contents

 

 

   

The Federalist Diaries

A Not-So-Divine Comedy, Part 5

No one can earn a million dollars honestly.
William Jennings Bryan, 1860 – 1925,
an American lawyer, statesman, and politician, three times the Democratic Party nominee for President of the United States.

The decadent international but individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found ourselves after the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not beautiful. It is not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn't deliver the goods.
-----  
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest [sic] of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.
John Maynard Keynes, 1883 – 1946,
a British economist whose ideas, called Keynesian economics, had a major impact on modern economic and political theory, as well as on many governments’ fiscal policies.  

In part one, we looked at the features of modern-day capitalism as practiced here in the United States .  In part two, we read of the role played by natural disasters in boosting a local economy.  In part three, we saw the tie between commercializing holidays and keeping the economy strong.  In part four, we saw that capitalism was not the solution to every problem or opportunity.  

Capitalism can and does interfere with the public good.  

On “World News Tonight,” January 11, 2008, Charles Gibson reported on an eleven year-old who was chosen “Person of the Week.”  

Jack Davis is only 11, but he had a pretty grown-up idea: He was disturbed to learn that Florida restaurants throw out food that could be given to the hungry and the homeless -- because the restaurant owners could be sued if anyone who ate the food became ill or developed food poisoning. ...

Jack's idea was to pass a law that would give restaurant owners' some protection from lawsuits. He got his dad to float the idea to some Florida legislators. ...  

It now seems certain that Jack's idea will become a law. ...  

"If you think there's a problem in the world," he said, "you don't wait for other people to fix it. You have to try to fix it yourself." ... http://abcnews.go.com/WN/PersonOfWeek/story?id=4123327&page=1

This seems so obvious, why is this not law in every state?  

To say that this would protect the homeless from bad food is specious.  There would be no benefit to a restaurant to give bad food to the homeless, unless the restaurant be malicious, in which case a different law would apply.  

So why is Jack’s idea not the law in every state?  Could it be that, if the liability were removed, trial lawyers would have one fewer cause of action through which to make money?  

Who does not remember the toy scare of 2007, when large numbers of toys were pulled off the shelves by retailers because of possible poisoning danger to children?  Did not Chinese manufacturers know the applicable law?  Did they ignore the law in order to maintain or maximize their profit?  (It could well be that, in a booming economy, the supply of manufacturing parts fall behind the demand for those parts.  So as not to loose a contract, Chinese manufacturers might look for substitutes.  That flexibility shows the strength of capitalism, but, at the same time, the weakness when not subject to inviolable standards to protect the public.)  

I find myself in a front-row seat to another example.  One Laptop per Child, www.laptop.org, is a nonprofit organization distributing a two-hundred dollar laptop to children in the developing world.  Intel, the microchip giant, was on the One Laptop board until the second week of January, when they parted ways because of a disagreement.  One Laptop said that, by manufacturing and promoting a competing laptop, Intel was undercutting One Laptop.  Intel said that competition would be good.  I side with One Laptop, because Intel has been unethical in the pursuit of profit, as when the company, years ago, failed to inform users about a faulty microchip.  

My English teacher at Montebello High School , Joann Barro, had us read Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People some thirty-five years ago:  

Dr. Stockmann is the popular citizen of a small coastal town in Norway . The town has recently invested a large amount of public and private money towards the development of baths, a project led by Dr. Stockmann and his brother, the Mayor. The town is expecting a surge in tourism and prosperity from the new baths, said to be of great medicinal value and as such, the baths are the pride of the town. However, as the baths are starting to succeed, Dr. Stockmann discovers that waste products from the town's tannery are contaminating the baths causing serious illness among the tourists. He expects this important discovery to be his greatest achievement, and promptly sends a detailed report to the Mayor, which includes a proposed solution, which would come at a considerable cost to the town.  

But to his surprise, Stockmann finds it difficult to get through to the authorities. …  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Enemy_of_the_People  

Capitalism is not synonymous with the public good.  In fact, we must give thought as to when capitalism would promote the public good, given that capitalism’s goal is primarily, if not solely, the pursuit of profit.

January 24, 2008

 

Back to Table of Contents

Back to the Top

 
    HOME  | "E-News" | Life's Problems  | "Montebello Oil" | Open Suggestion | Public Documents | Setting an Example | Young Thinkers | Project Instructions
                        Issues           and Solutions             Activities                    Box