No one can earn
a million dollars honestly.
William
Jennings
Bryan, 1860 – 1925,
an
American lawyer, statesman, and politician, three times the Democratic
Party nominee for President of the United States.
The decadent
international but individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found
ourselves after the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not
beautiful. It is not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn't deliver the
goods.
-----
Capitalism is the
astounding belief that the most wickedest [sic] of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of
everyone.
John Maynard
Keynes, 1883 – 1946,
a British
economist whose ideas, called Keynesian economics, had a
major impact
on modern economic and political theory, as well as on
many
governments’ fiscal policies.
In part one, we looked at the features of modern-day
capitalism as practiced here in the
United States
. In part two, we read of the
role played by natural disasters in boosting a local economy.
In part three, we saw the tie between commercializing holidays and
keeping the economy strong. In
part four, we saw that capitalism was not the solution to every problem or
opportunity.
Capitalism can and does interfere with the public good.
On “World News Tonight,” January 11, 2008, Charles
Gibson reported on an eleven year-old who was chosen “Person of the
Week.”
Jack Davis is
only 11, but he had a pretty grown-up idea: He was disturbed to learn that
Florida restaurants throw out food that could be given to the hungry and the
homeless -- because the restaurant owners could be sued if anyone who ate
the food became ill or developed food poisoning.
...
Jack's idea was
to pass a law that would give restaurant owners' some protection from
lawsuits. He got his dad to float the idea to some
Florida
legislators. ...
It now seems
certain that Jack's idea will become a law.
...
"If you
think there's a problem in the world," he said, "you don't wait
for other people to fix it. You have to try to fix it yourself."
...
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/PersonOfWeek/story?id=4123327&page=1
This seems so obvious, why is this not law in every
state?
To say that this would protect the homeless from bad
food is specious. There would be
no benefit to a restaurant to give bad food to the homeless, unless the
restaurant be malicious, in which case a different law would apply.
So why is Jack’s idea not the law in every state?
Could it be that, if the liability were removed, trial lawyers would
have one fewer cause of action through which to make money?
Who does not remember the toy scare of 2007, when large
numbers of toys were pulled off the shelves by retailers because of possible
poisoning danger to children? Did
not Chinese manufacturers know the applicable law?
Did they ignore the law in order to maintain or maximize their
profit? (It could well be that,
in a booming economy, the supply of manufacturing parts fall behind the
demand for those parts. So as
not to loose a contract, Chinese manufacturers might look for substitutes.
That flexibility shows the strength
of capitalism, but, at the same time, the weakness
when not subject to inviolable standards to protect the public.)
I find myself in a front-row seat to another example.
One Laptop per Child, www.laptop.org,
is a nonprofit organization distributing a two-hundred dollar laptop to
children in the developing world. Intel,
the microchip giant, was on the One Laptop board until the second week of
January, when they parted ways because of a disagreement.
One Laptop said that, by manufacturing and promoting a competing
laptop, Intel was undercutting One Laptop.
Intel said that competition would be good. I
side with One Laptop, because Intel has been unethical in the pursuit of
profit, as when the company, years ago, failed to inform users about a
faulty microchip.
My English teacher at
Montebello
High School
, Joann Barro, had us read Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People
some thirty-five years ago:
Dr. Stockmann is
the popular citizen of a small coastal town in
Norway
. The town has recently invested a large amount of public and private money
towards the development of baths, a project led by Dr. Stockmann and his
brother, the Mayor. The town is expecting a surge in tourism and prosperity
from the new baths, said to be of great medicinal value and as such, the
baths are the pride of the town. However, as the baths are starting to
succeed, Dr. Stockmann discovers that waste products from the town's tannery
are contaminating the baths causing serious illness among the tourists. He
expects this important discovery to be his greatest achievement, and
promptly sends a detailed report to the Mayor, which includes a proposed
solution, which would come at a considerable cost to the town.
But to his
surprise, Stockmann finds it difficult to get through to the authorities.
… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Enemy_of_the_People
Capitalism is not synonymous with the public good.
In fact, we must give thought as to when capitalism would promote the
public good, given that capitalism’s goal is primarily, if not solely, the
pursuit of profit.
January 24, 2008