Why
Not to Go to a City-Council
Meeting
You are waiting for me to dive
into the pool of partisan politics? Uh uh. If you
have been reading the community lessons and essays, you have sensed, perhaps
concluded, that something might be fundamentally wrong with our democracy, regardless
of which bloc of elected officials is in the majority.
Which leads to
the lesson of this week: why
avoid city-council meetings? Last
week we were talking about the lights of Montebello.
I opined that, to solve the problem of driver-unfriendly and
environmentally-unfriendly traffic signals, I would not
go to a meeting of our city council.
Pourquoi?
Our city council is too busy to do the job.
That simple. It does not
matter what a city councilor promised, it does not matter that your favorite
city councilor has his or her heart in the right place.
There are only so many hours in a day and none of us is superhuman.
You recall the rave entitled “Reality Check for High Schoolers”,
July 5, 2007? Parallel
situation: Scarcity of time.
Parallel physiology: all
too human.
Does that mean
that needed services do not get performed?
That, in fact, is the situation and, again, it does not matter which
bloc of city councilors is in the majority.
What can we do?
We can pay our city councilors to become full-time councilors.
(They practically are full-time now, with all that demands their
attention. The difference is
that we do not pay them to be full-time;
there is a huge difference between their pay and that of a state
legislator or member of Congress, who is considered full-time.)
You do not want
to pay them more? You fear that your elected friends would not be in the
majority on the city council, the opponents on the council would have more
time for mischief, and you would have to suffer through four years of baffle
and bewilderment? Well, then,
let us enlarge the city council,
that is, increase the number of council seats.
Los Angeles has fifteen councilors, Pasadena seven.
What prevents us from enlarging our city council?
Nothing.
Nothing at all. And if,
like the whining little boy in a short story by William Saroyan, we still
were not satisfied? There are
other solutions once we begin to think outside the box.
Stay tuned.
If
you answer the multiple-choice questions below and e-mail to lessonanswers@mymontebello.com
with “Lesson answers” in the subject field, you will be credited toward
a “certificate of recognition in community affairs” to be awarded in
2007 by a local nonprofit organization.
1. Why not go to our city council to have our traffic
signals fixed?
(a) Our city councilors have no authority to fix traffic signals.
(b) They are too busy to fix traffic signals quickly.
2. What options do we have?
(a) Pay our city council
to be full-time.
(b) Find Montebelloans
with superhuman strength and support them as candidates for city council.
(c) Enlarge the number
of council seats, so that more people be elected and the workload be divided
among them.
August 2, 2007